> While date rewriting is a pretty good kludge (as kludges go), I think it > will be harmful to routing over the long term. Take this simple example: ... > have to get the new document by requesting again. Thus Freenet's "routing > gets better over time" claim is undermined, as the routing only has one day > to get better. Well of course if you keep inserting new files and not requesting the old ones, routing doesn't get better in the same way because it doens't take advantage of caching. I would say that it "harms routing", merely that you can't optimize if you're always requesting new data. _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for ... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for ... tavin
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for ... Scott G. Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for ... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for ... Mark J. Roberts
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for ... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for ... Scott G. Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for ... Timm Murray
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for ... Mark J. Roberts
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for ... Timm Murray
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for ... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Mathew Ryden
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Mark J. Roberts
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Scott G. Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Mathew Ryden
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FPro... Mathew Ryden