> 
> To add support for MSKs to RequestClient, the obvious place to add it is
> ClientUtil.getKey, but I would have to overload it with another version
> that takes a MapHandler as an argument, and that's ugly and inefficient,
> because the key might not even be a MSK. So I could add a isMSK method to
> ClientUtil that takes the key string and checks. I'd do it in fillBuckets
> before the ClientKey is initialized, and if it returns true, I'd
> instantiate a MapHandler and run the key string through it first.

I don't think having a MapHandler as an argument to ClientUtil.getKey is
too terrible.  Why not have a static pointer to the MapHandler somewhere
so thtat ClientUtil.getKey can call the maphandler if it finds out the key
is a mapKey.  This would keep the code out of the actual clients and keep
it in the library.


_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev

Reply via email to