> > Why is there an efficiency problem with just re-requesting the map key? The > node already does cacheing for all keytypes, and that lets MSKs be "normal" > keys. Its better to cache them. Requests that are on the node may take less than a second to fulfill, but you have to do it for *every* link on a page, which could add up to a lot of time. _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Mathew Ryden
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FPro... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for... Mathew Ryden
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FPro... Timm Murray
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Travis Bemann
- RE: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Benjamin Coates
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Travis Bemann
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Timm Murray
- RE: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Benjamin Coates
- RE: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Mark J. Roberts
- RE: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Scott Gregory Miller
- RE: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Benjamin Coates
- RE: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Benjamin Coates
- RE: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Mark J. Roberts
- RE: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Benjamin Coates
- RE: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Mark J. Roberts
- RE: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Benjamin Coates
- RE: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Mark J. Roberts
- RE: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Benjamin Coates
- RE: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Mark J. Roberts
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy Timm Murray