RE: [Freenet-dev] Map files for FProxy

[Benjamin Coates]

> From "Mark J. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>The root entry could be named "zarkney" for all we care. Using nothing
>makes parsing the file difficult and has no advantage over using
>index.html. These things are going to be used 99.9% of the time for
>inserting Web sites, and Web sites assume index.html, so why change?
>
>--
>Mark Roberts
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]

If the parsing is so brittle that it can't handle an empty string, that's a 
problem aside from the whole index.html business.  index.html isn't mandatory 
for HTTP, why would we want it to be mandatory on Freenet, particularly since 
there is no guarantee whatsoever that the mapped site will be HTML-based.

--
Benjamin Coates


_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev