On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Brandon wrote: > > Ian: (noting who I'm responding to as per Oskar's request) > > I would also be interested to hear your comments on how my "Shadow > > Node" proposal (as posted here yesterday) compares to your proposal. > > At first I was very happy because it's a proposal which addresses the > problem and has support. So I thought great! Let's do it. > > However, I have some problems with it. The main problem is that you can't > randomly select gateways as you suggest. Well, you can randomly select one > the first time, but then all of the references to your node are based on > this node. So you can't switch gateways. And if the gateway gets shut > down the all of the references to your node are broken. Sure you can. Why not? _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymit... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anon... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator... tavin
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator... Adam Langley
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Oper... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Oper... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Oper... Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Oper... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anon... Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Oper... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Oper... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Oper... Scott Gregory Miller
- [Freenet-dev] Shadow Nodes (Was: Node Operator Anonym... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow Nodes (Was: Node Operat... Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow Nodes (Was: Node Op... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow Nodes (Was: Nod... Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow Nodes (Was: Node Op... Scott Gregory Miller