> Ah, I see. The web archives are optional, BTW, and list subscribers will
> run the daemon to put the latest messages right in their mailbox.
That sounds cool. I'd rather have a POP server so that I don't have to
download them. I'd rather not store mail on my local disk if I don't have
to.
> Anyway, if not EOF then what?
Well if you want to implement POP or SMTP then EOF. Otherwise we should
probably make a new project CVS module for contrib and put applications in
there. Or if there are a few applications in the same category we could
start a new project for them.
> Bad put freenetmirror in its own fucking module in
> the Freenet CVS, but that seems so haphazard.
Yeah, I'd like to keep the root CVS sparse.
> Freenet/contrib is tempting but Oskar doesn't like downloading stuff
> there.
We just need to make a new module for contrib stuff.
> I'm curious what protocols are being considered for EOF. A NNTP servlet
> that automatically downloads the latest messages for your subscribed
> groups would be one, but insertion over Freenet will never survive the
> flooding, at least with the present keytypes.
There's a list of subprojects in the DocManager on our sourceforge project
page. NNTP, SMTP, POP.
> Freenetmail is interesting
> but flooding will be a problem, and right now it doesn't automatically run
> as a daemon that checks for new messages every x seconds. Invoking it
> manually is annoying.
Yeah, it's just a proof of concept. My goal for mail is to have a JavaMail
provider and then SMTP and POP daemons on top of that which can run in the
node like FProxy or standalone.
> I like centrally-inserted moderated things like mailing lists and
> newsfeeds (from real news servers) because they're practical and resistant
> to attack. But I admit they're not as sexy as completely in-Freenet
> systems.
Yep, I agree on both counts. ;-)
_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
