On 2 Oct 2002, Lars Viklund wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 09:24, Pat Calhoun wrote:
> > > send the supplicant an EAPOL-Key message with an empty Key field, which
> > > means use the specified number of bits from the MS-MPPE-Send-Key as the
> > > key-mapping key.
> >
> > check... unfortunately, this doesn't appear to work.
>
> Do you mean "not work" in the sense that Win XP doesn't accept such
> EAPOL-Key messages that you send to it?
>
> > However, I found
> > going through the various revisions of the congdon draft that the
> > signature has changed over time, and this may be what's biting me. I
> > found that in -17 of the draft, the signature doesn't cover the EAPOL
> > header, while -20 it does. I suspect what's going on is that they are
> > trying to play catch up with the work in .1aa, but it would be really
> > nice if there were a draft that showed how 802.1X worked :(
> >
> > Any ideas how XP behaves?
>
> No, but I seem to remember that the Cisco 340 sends EAPOL-Key with an
> empty Key field (at least if 104-bit keys are used) and that this works
> with Win XP, so it should be possible to figure out the details.
>
ok, i could test that out. i know can sniff on the wireless link, so it
will be a matter of time - a week or something (till i'm back)
>
>
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
>
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
