I do not think that the AP will forward the MAC auth request to the FR and will try to do it all internally.
Wayne T Work, Sr. CISSP (Work) 203.217.5004 (Fax) 208-545-4365 Owner and Sr. Information Systems Security Consultant Security Gauntlet Consulting HIPAA Compliance Resource Group www.securitygauntlet.com www.hipaact.com -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ivan Barrera Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 2:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco AP350 series - Freeradius authentication warning. Thank you Vincent and Wayne for your answers. I think the problem is the AP configuration too, but since it is on service right now, and it is set for MAC address authentication, it is suppossed to send the request to the FR when the MAC is not found in its database. Do you think that maybe that setting (I mean forward requests to the FR) should work right? Can the authentication be shared between the AP and th FR? or is it an exclusive job for just one, the FR or the AP? So should I try to disable the MAC authentication at the AP just to see if that works? I am still checking the configuration, and it seems to be right, unless that "shared" authentication does not work well. I will check with cisco if there is a "work around" for this configuration. Thank you, Ivan Dario Barrera Graduate Student ECE - University of Delaware - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 N:Work;Wayne FN:Wayne T Work (E-mail) ORG:Security Gauntlet Consulting TITLE:Sr. Information Security Consultant TEL;WORK;VOICE:(203) 217-5004 TEL;CELL;VOICE:(203) 217-5004 ADR;WORK:;;56 Applewood Lane;Naugatuck;CT;06770;United States of America LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:56 Applewood Lane=0D=0ANaugatuck, CT 06770=0D=0AUnited States of America EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] REV:20021023T141508Z END:VCARD
