Kostas Kalevras wrote: > In any case, client updates are really rare actions. I think a HUP (in > one form or another) can be enough, especially taking into account the > extra work required to get any other way working right.
That's actually not completely true in our case. In our case, where we're actively deploying wireless APs, we can bring up several new NASes each day.
I'll probably be working on this pretty soon, but that's on hold at the moment while I attempt to track down a memory leak/heap corruption problem.
--Mike
----------------------------------- Michael Griego Wireless LAN Project Manager The University of Texas at Dallas
- List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
