Peter Nixon wrote: > > Yep. rlm_sqlippool and rlm_sql_postgresql are 2 other modules which have huge > changes in them.. Is it worth me spending some time tonight backporting them > or should we just wait for 2.0? (sqlippool seems to be getting quite some > interest of late)
I think we should just wait for 2.0. I've been holding off on 2.0 for a number of reasons, but I think we're better off releasing it earlier rather than later. Alan DeKok. -- http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the book http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html