Alan DeKok wrote: > matthew zeier wrote: >> What sort of additional information would be useful? > > doc/bugs > > i.e. WHERE the double free is. The message you showed says "something > went wrong.". That's nice. Which line of code needs to be changed?
How would I know where the double free is? Just running 'radiusd -X' spit out that error just before failing to run. > > Changing a line at random won't help. Hence the need to know where > the problem is. > >> If it matters, I was >> having the same problem with 1.1.5. > > Yes. That's fixed, and will be released in 1.1.6. How can I get that version? - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
