On Sun 15 Jul 2007, Hugh Messenger wrote: > Arran said: > > Peter said: > > > Maybe we should call the DB colum disconnect-key or something > > > similar... > > > > Sounds good :) > > I'll third that. Maybe even VendorDisconnectKey, which pretty much sums > it up. > > Peter - would you be changing that today, to make the 1.1.7 release? I > have a few hours reserved this afternoon to finish off the MySQL testing, > so I'm up for it.
Yep. The problem I have with this change though is that what are the other vendor disconnect keys? If you read the RFC it doesn't specify a specific key (Alan has been holding ongoing discussions about this on the ietf-radext list), just that there should be enough info to identify the correct session. As Cisco also uses it (and Juniper from AFAIK) XAscendSessionSvrKey has become a de-facto standard along with MS-Primary-DNS-Server and its ilk. Given that it is possible to send and have work a Disconnect-Request containing only a User-Name and there is no-where specified that there should be an individual session key I am not sure its worth changing unless someone can come up with a concrete example of a vendor who uses a session key thats different.... Is there? Cheers -- Peter Nixon http://peternixon.net/ - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html