Alexander Clouter wrote: > Yeah yeah...however as you are not ACK'ing my gtc/ldap patches it's > hardly a motivator to contribute :-/ *sigh*
I've looked at them. Now that 2.1.x is "stable", I am less worried about pulling them into a 2.2.x branch. i.e. they should be applied in the coming weeks, along with a lot of other patches. > ...alternatively we create a FreeRADIUS debug equilivent to the kernels > 'checkpatch.pl' which would be better still I would argue. Then no need > to worry about privacy of the spiel outputed, plus we *all* can then add > extra clauses/checks ourselves as we find them. Sure.. > This means the checking tool comes with FreeRADIUS. It can also gives > the users something to paste to the mailing list incase of problems > (although it probably be less useful than the raw '-X' output, and if > they are including anything they might aswell give us the full spiel). Yes. And the tool could *also* take care of running the server in debugging mode, and doing a bunch of sanity checks. > I was not really thinking past the common ones, however thinking about > things more so, I actually prefer the checkpatch.pl-esque approach, then > we can all contribute and fix things :) Sure. That's a lot easier to integrate than server patches. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html