John Dennis wrote: > Bottom line: I think the practice of loading every file found in a > directory is inherently risky and bug prone. I think it should only load > files with a specific extension, that seems much safer. This still works > nicely with the enabled/available split.
Sure. Is it critical enough to delay 2.1.9? Consider that there have been *sporadic* complaints since 2.0.0 (late 2007). Personally, I'd wait for 2.1.10. This work involves code changes *and* renaming configuration files. That's pretty drastic, and should be well tested before being released. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html