On Tue 18 May 2010, Alan DeKok wrote: > Nyamul Hassan wrote: > > Not meaning any disrespect to the "paid" offer, you could also > > reconsider to put up the current documentation in a "Wiki" style > > webpage, and from there everyone can work on the text that they think > > needs reworking. > > We already have a Wiki. Few people edit it. We already have a > publicly available "doc" directory. Few people submit changes. > > Putting the existing docs into a Wiki won't magically make people > submit changes. > > We're looking for an editor. All we want is someone who can organize > and format the existing documentation. There is no need for "in depth" > knowledge of RADIUS. There is no need for to write *new* documentation. > > That is work which is normally seen as "not fun". But it's needed. > Therefore, the offer to pay for services rendered.
Yes. I'll second Alan on this. It was my idea to setup the wiki, and I spent a LOT of time on it for a year or so, but have unfortunately not seen as much input from the community as we will have liked. (Although there are a notable few people who have done some work at various times... You know who your are..Thanks.) If there is only going to be a small group of people editing the docs, git and RST work much better than a wiki, and save maintaing both mediawiki and an SQL server :-) -- Peter Nixon http://peternixon.net/ - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html