> On Tue 18 May 2010, Alan DeKok wrote: >> Nyamul Hassan wrote: >> > Not meaning any disrespect to the "paid" offer, you could also >> > reconsider to put up the current documentation in a "Wiki" style >> > webpage, and from there everyone can work on the text that they think >> > needs reworking. >> >> We already have a Wiki. Few people edit it. We already have a >> publicly available "doc" directory. Few people submit changes. >> >> Putting the existing docs into a Wiki won't magically make people >> submit changes. >> >> We're looking for an editor. All we want is someone who can organize >> and format the existing documentation. There is no need for "in depth" >> knowledge of RADIUS. There is no need for to write *new* documentation. >> >> That is work which is normally seen as "not fun". But it's needed. >> Therefore, the offer to pay for services rendered. > > Yes. I'll second Alan on this. It was my idea to setup the wiki, and I > spent > a LOT of time on it for a year or so, but have unfortunately not seen as > much > input from the community as we will have liked. (Although there are a > notable > few people who have done some work at various times... You know who your > are..Thanks.) > > If there is only going to be a small group of people editing the docs, git > and RST work much better than a wiki, and save maintaing both mediawiki > and > an SQL server :-)
What file format is the documentation in and roughly how big is it? I'm a technical writer and I'm interested. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html