Hi Marc, > A licensing issue was spotted in ssl.c: the file contains SHA-1 and MD5 > implementations from Christophe Devine, which would be covered by the GPLv2 > license. We need to address the issue before releasing FreeRDP 0.9 (the > version where we officially claim we're all clean license-wise). > We have two choices: > 1) We find other implementations in a suitable license > 2) We implement SHA-1 and MD5 ourselves > Can anyone recommend certain alternative implementations for SHA-1 or MD5?
There is also RC4. I can find public domain code for this or write it. If you want, you can stub the functions out and only leave an empty function and I can complete it. I hope we don't remove the 'no crypto' library option, I use it alot. This way you can move forward on the license change without removing the functionality. Jay ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know! Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran developers boost performance applications - including clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ Freerdp-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freerdp-devel
