Hi Jonathan, FreeSurfer folks:

Did you have success in combining 4 echoes of MEMPRAGE images into one? I
went through the archives and it appears to me that you would use:
mris_make_surfaces -dura memprage_echo%d.mgz 4 subjid lh only after the
scan has been through the recon all process. My question is did you use
mri-concat to combine the 4 echoes into one?

thanks,

Alan


On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Jonathan Holt <whats...@umich.edu> wrote:

> Bruce,
>
> how is it that I might load multiple surfaces, loading lh after having
> loaded rh makes the other disappear. this is loading manually, not from the
> command line
> On May 13, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Jonathan Holt wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > last question promise. Successfully completed mris_make_surfaces for
> both hemispheres. in my day-to-day editing I open tkmedit thusly:
> >
> > tkmedit <subjid> brainmask.mgz -aux $SUBJECTS_DIR/subjid/mri/wm.mgz
> -surface $SUBJECTS_DIR/subjid/surf/lh.white -aux-surface
> $SUBJECTS_DIR/subjid/surf/rh.white -aparc+aseg
> >
> > this works for mprage subjects. In evaluating and possibly editing
> MEMPRAGE subjects, which surfaces should I have opened in tkmedit, as there
> seem to be many more this time around.
> >
> > best,
> > jon
> > On May 11, 2013, at 6:49 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Kayle
> >>
> >> it's been a long time since I wrote that code and we've only run it a
> few
> >> times. If you upload your subject directory I'll take a look
> >>
> >> cheers
> >> Bruce
> >> On Sat, 11 May
> >> 2013, Kayle Sawyer wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I tried to use the 4-echo MEMPRAGE dura detection for
> mris_make_surfaces, but I'm not sure if it worked. The terminal output,
> including commands, is attached. It was run with version
> freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-v5.3.0-BETA-20130509.
> >>>
> >>> On the original recon, in the rh, there is a segment of dura marked as
> grey inside the pial line, at 94 111 169. The surfaces did not appear to
> change substantially after I reran mris_make_surfaces with the -dura flag
> specifying the 4-echo MEMPRAGE, which I placed in the mri directory. You
> can see the before and after for yourself on the attached screenshots, or
> if you have NMR access, here:
> >>> /space/ficus/6/users/SNEF_edits/OB01_orig/
> >>> /space/ficus/6/users/SNEF_edits/OB01_orig_dura/
> >>>
> >>> I saw this output from mris_make_surfaces for the rh, so maybe -dura
> did correct a different defect?
> >>> 7 non-cortical segments detected
> >>> only using segment with 1900 vertices
> >>>
> >>> Any help would be appreciated, because we have over 130 brains and the
> fewer manual corrections, the better!
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> -Kayle
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> From: Douglas Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> >>> Date: Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:44 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Working with MEMPRAGE
> >>> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> the dcmunpack command is right. You should make sure to analyze only
> the
> >>> RMS in recon-all (ie , that is the only volume that goes into mri/orig
> >>> doug
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 5/9/13 6:48 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> >>>> Hi Kayle
> >>>>
> >>>> you would run recon-all on the RMS, then run the dura stuff posthoc.
> >>>>
> >>>> cheers
> >>>> Bruce
> >>>> On Thu,
> >>>> 9 May 2013, Kayle Sawyer wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Can the MEMPRAGE be specified in recon-all with the -i flag? We have
> been using the MEMPRAGE RMS scans and discarding the multiecho scans. If we
> instead specify the multiecho scans for recon-all, do we need to give any
> additional parameters (e.g. the number of echoes) for it to utilize the 4
> echoes to detect dura and refine pial surfaces in mris_make_surfaces, as
> described below? Or would we have to run recon-all with the RMS, then after
> it finishes re-run mris_make_surfaces manually with the -dura flag to
> refine the pial surface?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Also, I'd like to make sure we are using dcmunpack properly. We take
> the
> >>>> scan.info file and parse it like this: "-run [MEMPRAGE_4e_p2_1mm_iso
> run
> >>>> number] 3danat mgz 001.mgz" so the multi echo scan gets put into one
> mgz
> >>>> file, and the RMS gets put into a separate mgz file.
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> -Kayle
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On May 9, 2013, at 12:00 PM, 
> >>>>> freesurfer-requ...@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduwrote:
> >>>>>> Message: 35
> >>>>>> Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 10:44:23 -0400 (EDT)
> >>>>>> From: Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Working with MEMPRAGE
> >>>>>> To: Jonathan Holt <whats...@umich.edu>
> >>>>>> Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >>>>>> Message-ID:
> >>>>>>   <alpine.lrh.2.02.1305091043500.13...@gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> >>>>>> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> it needs to be:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> mris_make_surfaces -dura memprage_echo%d.mgz 4 subjid lh
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> note the "4" which tells it how many echoes to read
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, 9 May 2013, Jonathan Holt wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I input:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> mris_make_surfaces -dura memprage_echo%d.mgz subjid lh
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> it returns:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> detecting dura using 0 echos from memprage_echo%d.mgz
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Should I execute the command in the same directory as the mgz's?
> Should they be set up or placed in a specific directory? I also, as with
> recon-all, exported the proper subject directory beforehand.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On May 9, 2013, at 10:37 AM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> can you send me the full command line? It should say 4 echoes,
> not 0
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 9 May 2013, Jonathan Holt wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks Bruce,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> should the hemisphere's be processed separately, or how do I
> signify lh and rh simultaneously?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Also, should the fact that after running mris_make_surfaces, it
> says "detecting dura using 0 echos from memprage_echo%d.mgz" be worrisome?
> I've got 4 different echos, all mgzs in the directory. I have a feeling I'm
> doing this incorrectly.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> jon
> >>>>>>>>> On May 9, 2013, at 8:50 AM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Jon
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> yes, the subject and hemi need to be defined (they are required
> parameters)
> >>>>>>>>>> Bruce
> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 May 2013, Jonathan Holt wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>>>>>>> combed through the mail archives to figure out how to work
> with multi echo
> >>>>>>>>>>> mprage, found what I need but I wanted to confirm which of
> these two
> >>>>>>>>>>> commands is the appropriate
> >>>>>>>>>>> mris_make_surfaces -dura memprage_echo%d.mgz 4 subjid lh/rh
> >>>>>>>>>>> mris_make_surfaces -dura memprage_echo%d.mgz do the subjid and
> hemispheres need to be specified as per the 1st line?
> >>>>>>>>>>> jon
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Freesurfer mailing list
> >>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Freesurfer mailing list
> >>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Freesurfer mailing list
> >>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom
> it is
> >>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> >>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> >>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to
> you in error
> >>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender
> and properly
> >>> dispose of the e-mail.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Freesurfer mailing list
> >> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Freesurfer mailing list
> > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to