External Email - Use Caution        

Thanks. I ran several subjects that were native 0.82 x 0.82 x 0.85mm through 
the standard recon-all -all stream, with the -hires flag (but with no experts 
file). The volumes and surafces look good. Is there any need to be concerened 
with the output since I did not use an experts file?

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Bruce Fischl
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2018 7:52 AM
To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] using T2 for hippo subfields

no it is not required

cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 4 Apr 2018, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote:

> Per an earlier post below, is an 'expert_file' always required when using the 
> -hires option?
>
> Jim
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ______________________________
> From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> <freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Alexopoulos,
> Dimitrios <dimitriosalexopou...@wustl.edu>
> Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2018 9:47:07 PM
> To: Freesurfer support list
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] using T2 for hippo subfields
>
> Thanks for the input. I processed a few subjects (T1-mprage, 0.8mm
> isotropic) using the -hires flag, with no expert file, which generated nice 
> surfaces.
>
> Is an 'expert_file' required ??
>
>
> Jim
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ______________________________
> From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> <freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Iglesias
> Gonzalez, Eugenio <e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 11:02:00 AM
> To: Freesurfer support list
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] using T2 for hippo subfields
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> In the end it's an empirical question, but my gut feeling is that the
> T1 with hi-res flag will be best.
>
> Cheers,
>
> /E
>
>
>
> --
>
> Juan Eugenio Iglesias
>
> ERC Senior Research Fellow
>
> Translational Imaging Group
>
> University College London
>
> http://www.jeiglesias.com
>
> http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/
>
>
>
>
>
> From: <freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of "Alexopoulos, 
> Dimitrios"
> <dimitriosalexopou...@wustl.edu>
> Reply-To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Date: Friday, 23 March 2018 at 16:00
> To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Subject: [Freesurfer] using T2 for hippo subfields
>
>
>
> Hi. We are acquiring sequences on a pediatric cohort that include a
> T1-mprage (0.8mm isotropic) and a T2-space (1mm isotropic), and I'd
> like to run the hippocampal subfields module on the subjects using FS 6.0.
>
>
>
> Is it recommended/useful to run the multispectral segmentation mode
> with the additional lower resolution T2 sequence?
>
> I read that you really only benefit if the T2 is of similar or better 
> resolution than the T1.
>
>
>
> If that's the case, would it be best to just run with the single T1
> but with the hi-res flag in the recon-all command?
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jim
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ______________________________
>
>
> The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected
> Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If
> you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized
> use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on
> the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
> this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or 
> return mail.
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ______________________________
>
>
> The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected
> Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If
> you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized
> use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on
> the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
> this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or 
> return mail.
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ______________________________
>
>
> The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected
> Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If
> you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized
> use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on
> the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
> this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or 
> return mail.
>
>
>

________________________________
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to