External Email - Use Caution It is group level, result of 2nd-level analysis. I preprocessed data of 50 subjects with FSFAST and SPM respectively, then I used SPM to do the 1st- and 2nd-level modelling. The version of FS now I use is 6.0 I think: freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-pub-v6.0.0-2beb96c.
Best, Lizhi On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 11:55, Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. < dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: > is this an individual or group? what version of FS are you running. > > On 7/11/19 11:10 AM, Zhi Li wrote: > > > > External Email - Use Caution > > > > Dear Freesurfer experts, > > > > Now I am using both FSFAST and SPM to preprocessed my functional image > > data. In FSFAST, I replaced the subcortical template with the whole > > brain in the folder "mri.2mm", to get the whole brain volumetric data. > > I have also diluted the whole brain template in FSFAST. However, as > > showed in attached files, the resampled data in FSFAST seems smaller > > than that of SPM. May I ask if it is normal? Would the mask creation > > step in FSFAST caused this difference? I read from a previous PPT > > which said "FSL BET run on the template" in mask creation. As far as I > > know, the default parameter in BET may strip some part of prefrontal > > lobe sometime. If FSFAST apply BET or similar algorithm to strip > > skull, may I ask how could I change the parameter? Looking forward to > > your kind suggestions. > > > > Thanks and best wishes, > > > > Lizhi > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Freesurfer mailing list > > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
