The uncorrected results will be exactly the same. The corrected results should be more significant
On 8/18/2020 7:44 PM, Erin Moe wrote: > External Email - Use Caution > > Hi Doug, > Thanks for the prompt reply. I did use the label option in mri_glmfit, but it > seemed to just show the same results as the whole brain analysis but for only > in the region defined by the label. When I load the sig scalar into QDEC from > the label analysis as well as sig scalar from the whole brain analysis, the > results looks exactly the same within the region that I have labeled. > Wouldn’t constraining the analysis to just the region defined by the label > potentially increase the power and therefore the significance? When I compare > the significant clusters from both analyses they show the same values. My > apologies if this is not the case, I am a bit rusty with my stats. > Thanks again for all the help! > Erin > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
