If you want a cluster table, then you will have to run mri_surfcluster on the 
output of the conjunction. Run it with --help and write back if you need more 
info

On 11/21/2020 10:03 AM, Paula Maldonado wrote:

        External Email - Use Caution

Dear Douglas,

Could you please tell me where can I find the cluster table?

Thank you,
Best regards,

Paula

Il giorno 11 nov 2020, alle ore 17:32, Douglas N. Greve 
<dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>> ha scritto:

There is not a summary table, it is just a map. Do you want a cluster table?

On 11/10/2020 11:26 AM, Paula Maldonado wrote:

        External Email - Use Caution

Thanks for your reply, that worked. Can you please tell me where I can find a 
summary table of the activated regions resulting from the conjunction analysis?

Best regards,

Paula




Il giorno 27 ott 2020, alle ore 22:50, Douglas N. Greve 
<dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>> ha scritto:

You would just run mkcontrast-sess, eg, if your four conditions are
ordered condA, condAcontrol, condB, condBcont, then
mkcontrast-sess -analysis analysis -contrast contrastname -a 1 -c 2 -c 3
-a 4
If you want it reversed, then just reverse the a's and c's

On 10/23/2020 4:39 AM, Paula Maldonado wrote:
        External Email - Use Caution

Dear experts,
I am running an fMRI experiment in which I have four conditions: two main 
conditions (condition A and condition B) and two respective control conditions 
(condition Acontrol and condition Bcontrol).
I would like to create a map showing significantly greater activity for 
condition A relative to condition B, after subtracting out the activity for the 
respective control conditions. In other words, I would like to perform the 
following contrast:
(condition A - condition A control) - (condition B - condition B control)
Then I would like to have a map that shows the reverse contrast too:(condition 
B - condition B control) - (condition A - condition A control).

How do I do that?To obtain the first map: (condition A - condition A control) - 
(condition B - condition B control) I have tried with the mergecontrasts-sess 
function with the -conjunction flag and the OR option as detailed below:
mergecontrasts-sess -mergedcontrast conjres -conjunction or -analysis 
analysisname -map sig -space sph -isxavg fixed -contrast Contrast1 2 pos 0 
-contrast Contrast 2 pos 0 -s sessionsfMRI/Sub01/bold -hemi lh

where Contrast1= (condition A - condition A control) and Contrast2= (condition 
B - condition B control)
however the map I get is exactly the same as (condition A - condition A 
control), as if subtracting out Contrast 2 had no impact on the map.

Thanks,

Paula



_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" 
claiming to be 
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer<https://secure-web.cisco.com/1MSoNZugOE7aA1gOT7VibT4hmgT8729NyDyuSI5M_XIIJSHN9Oa6mpnmC2hkuFPGXkj7yukLmsGUfZBLZlQdYsY2AxtcrFwTAUaJit7RnSO-H3GPvE9U-FUvEA1D-EbOKM7OhgHOgL7846L6UgEhe81mVpJtl2L3sDGDBm7MSG4ChljHVJ517sv6mBgstQqHkHndzlu186P6Y6HoLybv0FzehRXKGA7DUFTgNZ2LwQfBNW5QeulsSuRIGiB3wlK4H99pjN1XyQPXgV5XCwCSaKg/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer>

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" 
claiming to be 
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer<https://secure-web.cisco.com/1MSoNZugOE7aA1gOT7VibT4hmgT8729NyDyuSI5M_XIIJSHN9Oa6mpnmC2hkuFPGXkj7yukLmsGUfZBLZlQdYsY2AxtcrFwTAUaJit7RnSO-H3GPvE9U-FUvEA1D-EbOKM7OhgHOgL7846L6UgEhe81mVpJtl2L3sDGDBm7MSG4ChljHVJ517sv6mBgstQqHkHndzlu186P6Y6HoLybv0FzehRXKGA7DUFTgNZ2LwQfBNW5QeulsSuRIGiB3wlK4H99pjN1XyQPXgV5XCwCSaKg/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer>




_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" 
claiming to be 
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer<https://secure-web.cisco.com/1MSoNZugOE7aA1gOT7VibT4hmgT8729NyDyuSI5M_XIIJSHN9Oa6mpnmC2hkuFPGXkj7yukLmsGUfZBLZlQdYsY2AxtcrFwTAUaJit7RnSO-H3GPvE9U-FUvEA1D-EbOKM7OhgHOgL7846L6UgEhe81mVpJtl2L3sDGDBm7MSG4ChljHVJ517sv6mBgstQqHkHndzlu186P6Y6HoLybv0FzehRXKGA7DUFTgNZ2LwQfBNW5QeulsSuRIGiB3wlK4H99pjN1XyQPXgV5XCwCSaKg/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer>

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer




_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to