External Email - Use Caution        

Hi Marie,

Looking at the source code, samseg's sbtiv.stats file sums the volume of
the structures listed below. I'm not sure about recon-all's, but I'm
assuming it should be similar.

There is indeed no readily-made result for the sum of subcortical
structures in samseg, but summing their volumes manually (as you suggest)
is indeed the right way to go.

Regarding any discrepancies between recon-all and samseg: these are two
quite different methods, so some differences are not unexpected. I think
what matters most in your application is to compare volumetry between
patient groups *wiithin* each method -- hopefully such differences can be
detected reliably no matter which method you use.

Hope this helps,

Koen

            'Brain-Stem',
            'CSF',
            'Left-Cerebellum-Cortex',
            'Right-Cerebellum-Cortex',
            '4th-Ventricle',
            'Left-Cerebral-Cortex',
            'Right-Cerebral-Cortex',
            'Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter',
            'Right-Cerebellum-White-Matter',
            'Right-Cerebral-White-Matter',
            'Left-Cerebral-White-Matter',
            'Right-choroid-plexus',
            'Right-Amygdala',
            'Left-Amygdala',
            'Right-Hippocampus',
            'Right-Inf-Lat-Vent',
            'Left-Hippocampus',
            'Left-choroid-plexus',
            'Left-Inf-Lat-Vent',
            'Optic-Chiasm',
            'Right-VentralDC',
            'Left-VentralDC',
            '3rd-Ventricle',
            'Left-Accumbens-area',
            'Left-Putamen',
            'Right-Putamen',
            'Right-vessel',
            'Right-Accumbens-area',
            'WM-hypointensities',
            'Left-Lateral-Ventricle',
            'Left-vessel',
            'Right-Lateral-Ventricle',
            'Right-Pallidum',
            'Left-Caudate',
            'Right-Thalamus',
            'Left-Pallidum',
            'Right-Caudate',
            'Left-Thalamus',
            'non-WM-hypointensities',
            '5th-Ventricle',
            'Lesions'




On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 2:30 PM Ringki Marie Siewert <ringki.siew...@gmx.de>
wrote:

>         External Email - Use Caution
>
> Hello Freesurfer Developers,
>
> I'm a medical student using Freesurfer for my PhD. My goal is to measure
> brain volume and perform brain segmentation of children aged 2-12 years
> with a leukodystrophy and compare them to controls.
> I tried both segmentation tools Samseg and recon_all, and now I have some
> questions about the measurements for I can't find any answers on the wiki
> pages.
>
>  -1. in the sbTIV.stats file created by Samseg the intracranial volume is
> estimated, however, I don't know wether or not this measurement includes
> ventricles or to what value of the recon_all aseg.stats file sbTIV.stats
> corresponds as there are different brain segmentation values.
>
> -2. of what parts constist the total grey matter volume in recon-all? When
> I sum up cortical grey matter volume and subcortical grey matter volume
> given in the aseg.stats file the measurement differs from value of total
> gray matter volume.
>
> -3. of what parts consists the subcortical grey matter volume in
> recon-all? Samseg measures each structure individually but does not give an
> overall measurement of subcortical grey matter, is there any way to obtain
> an overall subcortical measurment via samseg?
>
> -4. last but not least, Samseg and recon-all - even though given the same
> input file - create very different measurements for cortex volume and
> overall grey matter volume (using Samseg I simply add up the cortex
> measurement and each subcortical structure but I'm not sure if that is the
> right way to go) as well as the volume of ventricles and choroid plexus
> (using Samseg I add up the volumes of the two lateral ventricles, third
> ventricle and fourth ventricle as well as the choroid plexus)
>
> I attached the aseg.stats file given by recon-all and the samseg.stats and
> sbTIV.stats file created running both commands for one person with the same
> input. I tried many other brain scans but the estimation
> tendencies stay the same for all of them.
>
>
> At last I want to thank you for all your hard work! I really appreciate
> all the advice and support you give.
>
>
>
> Have a nice day,
>
>
>
> Marie
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is addressed.  If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Mass General
> Brigham Compliance HelpLine at
> https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline <
> https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline> .
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed.  If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail 
contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham 
Compliance HelpLine at https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline 
<https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline> .
Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted).  If you do not wish to 
continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of 
this message immediately.  Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after 
receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to 
continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail. 

Reply via email to