Hi,
On 26-10-12 10:44, David Rowe wrote: > Hi Jimmy, > > Very good work .... nice to be able to hear the effect f each bit > getting messed up. I second that. A nice example of the advantages of open source: the ability to learn how something works!!! :-) Good job Jim! Just wondering: Is there a difference in the format of the codec2 frames for voiced and unvoiced frames? As far as I understand the theory, voice and unvoiced frames have very different characteristics; so I guess, the format of the codec2 frame will also be different. Do the bits have a different means when used for a voiced or a unvoice frame. And what if the 20 or 40 ms timeslot contains both voiced and unvoiced (10 ms) frames? Does it make sence to do Jimmys exercise again, once for only voiced framed and once for only unvoiced frames? If this would be the case, we could try to work out a different FEC and/or interleaver for voiced or unvoiced frames. Or am I making things to complicated? > Cheers, > David 73 Kr. Bonne ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WINDOWS 8 is here. Millions of people. Your app in 30 days. Visit The Windows 8 Center at Sourceforge for all your go to resources. http://windows8center.sourceforge.net/ join-generation-app-and-make-money-coding-fast/ _______________________________________________ Freetel-codec2 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
