ahh yes, my bad. Alex, thanks for drawing that to my attention.
On 3/09/2015 10:03 PM, Alexandru Csete wrote: > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 3:38 AM, glen english <[email protected]> wrote: >> Nice work Alex >> >> For a lump of code to be using THAT much CPU, and these CPUs are very >> capable something must be terribly wrong. maybe turn some of the >> optimizations off and see what happens. Can you break it down to >> computation effort (something stuck in a loop, loop variable getting >> trashed leading to excessive iterations) or cache thrashing ? >> > Hi Glen, > > Just to be clear, the numbers I posted do not express CPU load like > e.g. top or time does. Instead they show how much % of the application > execution time is spent in various functions. That's why I didn't post > any hardware details. > > The perf tool is developed by linux kernel devs and is available on > any linux system with kernel 2.6 or later: > https://perf.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page > > It can do much more advanced profiling than what I posted (also at > assembly level), but even in its simplest form it gives a good idea of > where an application spends most time. > > Alex > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any Scale With Datadog! > Get real-time metrics from all of your servers, apps and tools > in one place. > SourceForge users - Click here to start your Free Trial of Datadog now! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=241902991 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any Scale With Datadog! Get real-time metrics from all of your servers, apps and tools in one place. SourceForge users - Click here to start your Free Trial of Datadog now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=241902991&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Freetel-codec2 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
