> It turns out that since 2.4.3 the cubic deviations have been
> estimated *after* UPSCALE, whereas conic ones have been evaluated
> *before* UPSCALE. This was probably the original sin that led to
> the misuse of FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION that we've just fixed in
> "cubic". Let's fix the original sin now.
I won't comment the patch itself since I'm not too acquainted with
those intricate geometric details. However, please resend your patch
as an attachment; your mailing program inserts replaces ordinary
spaces with non-breaking space characters at arbitrary places...
> Frankly, I would just adapt the cubic approach to conic splines too.
Sounds reasonable if it gains some speed...
Werner
_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
