>> Don't hurry. Both Graham and Bevan are busy people (and me too),
>> so it will take a while to get proper responses. However, I second
>> Graham's request for images which help a lot in the discussion.
>
> Attention: blind test. Check the quality of o's.
> The better image is vanilla 2.4.3.
> The worse image is the HEAD.
I consider conic0.png the better image. However, the differences are
very subtle.
Werner
_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
