Hi Suzuki, You are right, it is not a regression. I mistakengly replied to an old email.
IvanN -----Original Message----- From: suzuki toshiya [mailto:mpsuz...@hiroshima-u.ac.jp] Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 8:03 PM To: inin...@pdftron.com Cc: w...@gnu.org; freetype-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [ft-devel] Regression issue - CFF I reproduced this issue by 2.4.6, 2.3.12, 2.3.0. Although it would be an issue, I think this is NOT regression. Regards, mpsuzuki Ivan Nincic wrote: > Hello Werner, > > FYI: I ran into a discrepancy between how FT (latest) and Acrobat > render some CFF fonts. > It seem that the error is cause due to interpretation of the fill rule > (even odd vs. winding) or something like that. > > The font file was generated with Adobe PaperCapture. > > IvanN > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ivan Nincic [mailto:inin...@pdftron.com] > Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 10:50 AM > To: 'w...@gnu.org' > Cc: 'da...@freetype.org'; 'freetype-devel@nongnu.org' > Subject: Regression issue - CFF > > Hello Werner, > > FYI: I run into a regression issue with the latest FT (trunk) version. > Attached is a sample font. I don't claim that this is a valid font > however FT was able to render the file in 2.4.4 but not in 2.4.9. > > IvanN > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > _______________________________________________ > Freetype-devel mailing list > Freetype-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
