> I am still not convinced that this is a good idea to deploy two
> versions in parallel. That LEAN suffix will stay long after
> Infinality is gone.
Maybe there is a better macro name?
> Why can't you just replace Infinality? I doubt that Infinality
> itself was tested and maintained enough to be protected species.
AFAIK, there is a huge user base, with a lot of variations on the used
parameters. FreeType is a mature library, and suddenly changing such
broadly used features is not user friendly IMHO.
Additionally, having the two in parallel allows better comparison.
Werner
_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
