In the photocomp era, may different machines were developed that produced
the same visual typography using different methods :)

On 2 September 2017 at 19:30, Behdad Esfahbod <beh...@behdad.org> wrote:

> At least in the English that I learned, two things that are not the same
> are different. So I find the claim that "they are more same than different,
> as such are not different" to be patently false.
>
> On Sep 1, 2017 11:47 PM, "Werner LEMBERG" <w...@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> > I am contacting you to have some information regarding the patent
>> > for the LCD subpixel filtering.
>> >
>> > I am currently using the Skia library with freetype, and I noticed
>> > in your website<https://www.freetype.org/patents.html> that there is
>> > a patent regarding this feature, but it’s really unclear if it’s
>> > possible to enable it with no risks or not.
>>
>> Well, we can't answer this since we aren't lawyers.  We can only warn
>> that it the ClearType LCD filtering stuff is patented...
>>
>> > Will it be possible to have more information about it?
>>
>> Not from us, sorry.
>>
>> > Or is there a safe way to use the feature?
>>
>> The next release of FreeType will provide a different LCD sub-pixel
>> rendering method as the default (called `Harmony'), yielding
>> approximately identical results.  To our best knowledge the new
>> algorithm is not affected by any patents.
>>
>>
>>     Werner
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freetype-devel mailing list
>> Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freetype-devel mailing list
> Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
>
>


-- 
Cheers
Dave
_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel

Reply via email to