On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Aubin Paul wrote:
> I split mine into freevo and freevo-media, since freevo is the most
> dynamic part of the package, and is significantly smaller than the
> skins, icons, fonts, etc.
Hmm. I don't know if standardizing the package naming convention across
distros is a worthwhile goal to shoot for, but currently I won't be able
to generate 'freevo-media' for the src-only distribution (it defaults to
freevo-src-media for subpackages).
>
> A full binary would ideally go into /usr/lib/python2.X/site-packages,
> but it can be placed into /usr/local/ if you want. Either case will
> work thanks to Dischi :)
Do you mean that it'd be
/usr/lib/python2.X/site-packages/freevo/{runtime, src, skins, ...}
I feel that's more confusing than putting it under
/usr/local/freevo. (Either we follow the standard properly like for
freevo-src, or else we should stick to /usr/local/freevo)
T.C.
----
Wan Tat Chee (Lecturer)
School of Computer Science, Univ. of Science Malaysia,
11800 USM, Penang, Malaysia. Rm.625 Ofc Ph: +604 653-3888 x 3617
NRG Lab Admin: +604 659-4757 Rm.601-E Ofc Ph: +604 653-4396
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://nrg.cs.usm.my/~tcwan
GPG Key : http://nrg.cs.usm.my/~tcwan/tcw_gpg-20030322.asc
F'print : DCF2 B9B2 FA4D 1208 AD59 14CA 9A8F F54D B2C4 63C7
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Freevo-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-devel
