>> On Friday, April 25, 2008 at 22:22 Duncan Webb wrote:
> Sorry I didn't mean that you patch was in any way invalid.

No harm done! :o)

> I was just trying to say where the correct path now is. As of 2.6.24
> there does not seem to be any sensors in the /sys/devices/platform/ path.

I see. My uname -r says:

# 2.6.24-gentoo-r3

and /sys/devices/platform is filled as usual. But maybe this is due to
one of the Gentoo patches.

> I think that the module is now invalid as it is possible to have more
> than one path with sensors. On my AMD64 there are two sensor paths one 
> for the sensors and one for the processor. I suspect that it would be 
> best to allow each sensor's path to be specified.

If I find the time, I'll look into the module and see, how it could be
done more dynamically. E.g., I'd rather like to see three temperatures:

system, coretemp0, coretemp1

so maybe the module could be restructured to accept an arbitrary number
of tuples: ('sensorname', 'sensorpath', 'sensortype') - sensortype
being one of e.g. 'sys' or 'cpu' - in addition to things like
'MemFree'.

Would that be a helpful contribution?

Regards,
Torsten
-- 
Never make anything simple and efficient when a way can be found to
make it complex and wonderful.              - Murphy's Law No. 13 -


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Freevo-devel mailing list
Freevo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-devel

Reply via email to