"Pferdekaemper, Thorsten" wrote: >> > Hi, >> > I have had a hard time yesterday to find out why it is that slow, >> > but I found the problem. Now, I can scan my problematic disc with >> > 720 jpegs... (Not really 1000, but a lot...) The scanning now needs >> > less than one minute for the whole disc, so I can live with it. >> >> Current CVS only scans the needed directories so it should be under 10 >> sec. > > I do not really believe that. There are directories with about 50 > pictures. Each picture needed about one second or even a little bit > more...
If you now need less than a minute for the whole disc, it should be less than 10 sec for one directory, right? Because CVS now has the following new features: o only scan needed dirs, even on disc (since yesterday, should speed up things) o I looked at the image you send me: EXIF.py now ignores fields greater 10000. Everything elese will be parsed. This should speed up again. And that you know how long it takes: o there is now a progress bar when freevo scans a directory The snapshots should be updated tomorrow, please test and let me know the results. Dischi -- According to Kentucky state law, every person must take a bath at least once a year. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
