On Thu, April 16, 2009 9:19 pm, Bill Bierman wrote: > Actually I didn't even mean to send those attachments. That was just > my attempt at making the commercial detection more readable (and > hopefully a bit more accurate). It was in the course of developing > this patch that I realized the fundamental flaw in the approach. When > I first drafted the message with the attachments I was doing it > simultaneously with drafting the patch, and was going to submit my > 'fix'. I just forgot to remove the attachment. > > While it might make the system a bit more accurate, it too will most > likely not work. > >
Bill any chance you can point us at the other methods you found that MythTV are using. We can hopefully incorporate some of the things they are doing, we are both after all Open Source projects and there is no reason not to use a better method if available. Cheers Adam ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p _______________________________________________ Freevo-users mailing list Freevo-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
