Hi, Dirk!

On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 04:05:05PM +0100, Dirk Nehring wrote:
> sorry, I cannot follow it. I do not understand what do you mean with
> 
> "provide certain information about the part they belong to which has to
> be shared between different parts".

Well, this sentence describes how exactly redundancy will be reduced
through these files: equal information which up to now exists at different
places (i.e. "has to be shared between different parts") will exist at
one single place (the info.nfo file), but only the information that also
belongs together (information about a single part), so each file belongs
to a certain part of the build system, for now think of "parts" as of
"packages".

> Please explain what is the goal of these files? Do you want to
> generate documentation? Where is the redunance actually?

The exact content of these files is not fixed yet, but this is a sample
use of them, holding both multi- and single-line documentation of a
package, which will be written into it's Config.in and CONTROL file.

> One suggestion: I (personally) do not like suffixes which are very
> uncommon like ".nfo". Why not to use something like "DESCRIPTION.txt"?

Oh, I forgot to mention that critics is allowed in any case, but not
when it comes to the naming of the file. I remember very well how three
people (namely wbx, tg and me) were sitting together and discussing
possible names. "info.nfo" is a symbiosis of our ideas, and I personally
think it's 1337ness is at a very high level. Indeed, it is commonly
used - by computer artists for naming their ascii-art, and microsoft for
naming files holding system-information - I think our interpretation is
a good mixture. :)

To get you a better image of the files' content, here is sample content
that might be held in them when used in the first intended usage (one
for each package):

- name
- version
- descriptions
- dependencies (in many different flavours)
- selects (could also be seen as kind of dependency)
- default values

Greetings, Phil

Attachment: pgphYioDxzG2T.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
freewrt-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers

Reply via email to