Phil Sutter dixit:
>You're sure this is how the dependency mentioned above ought to be used?
>Doesn't it rather decide whether a package should be installed into the
>rootfs image?
Yes and no. If it's y/m it should be built. If it's y it should be
packaged into the root fs, but that's not what I mean here.
>Rewriting all calls to PKG_template is not acceptable.
Why? We're touching all Makefiles anyway. Plus, this'd be easy to script.
>This is why I
>suggested a solution where only the template has to be changed
How would you do that? In the asterisk case, what differences
are between the first and the second call?
>> An alternative solution:
>> - ifeq ($(FWRT_PACKAGE_$(1)),y)
>> + ifneq (${FWRT_PACKAGE_$(1)}${DEVELOPER},)
>
>This is about what I want to have, but best defined as make function, so
>one doesn't have to type so much, and it's easy to remember.
No, that's INSIDE the template.
>Please note that the problem is merely missing control over what
>sub-packages are build when using 'package=foobar'
Wrong, because a full make has the same problems(*).
>This is the jumping point (taken from mk/package.mk):
>| ifneq ($(FWRT_PACKAGE_$(1)),)
>| compile-targets: $$(IPKG_$(1))
>| endif
>| ifneq ($(DEVELOPER),)
>| compile-targets: $$(IPKG_$(1))
>| endif
compile-targets are no longer used.
That's what I meant.
>BTW: I had my problems with asterisk also when using just 'make', so
>it's not a problem of building with 'package=asterisk'!
I said that above at (*).
bye,
//mirabile
--
"Using Lynx is like wearing a really good pair of shades: cuts out
the glare and harmful UV (ultra-vanity), and you feel so-o-o COOL."
-- Henry Nelson, March 1999
_______________________________________________
freewrt-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers
