I've been curious about the change in the Times apparent politics. I think it's actually detaching itself from politics maybe, but in a curious way. I see more and more pieces that seem carefully crafted for particular audiences, so that instead of having one voice that you can get used to and know what to expect from, you now have more blush pieces for targeted interests. Their editorial positions are still seem well researched, fair minded and practical, but the news is for rent more and more of the time. Anyone else notice that?
Phil Henshaw ¸¸¸¸.·´ ¯ `·.¸¸¸¸ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 680 Ft. Washington Ave NY NY 10040 tel: 212-795-4844 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] explorations: www.synapse9.com <http://www.synapse9.com/> -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 2:10 PM To: friam@redfish.com Subject: Re: [FRIAM] NYTimes.com: The Problems in Modeling Nature,With Its Unruly Nat... Unfortunately, the NYT is no longer the newspaper it once was. It's reporting on the invasion, its justification and subsequent events is a case in point. Paul Paryski _____ AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at <http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/1615326657x4311227241x4298082137/aol?redi r=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eaol%2Ecom> AOL.com.
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
