In my role as FRIAM's official Cassandra (I should get a T-shirt printed), has anyone ever shown that these highly intensive simulations give quantitatively better results than, say, something written on Owen's laptop in NetLogo? Do we know that we get a better assessment of (for example) the robustness of policies for stopping epidemic spread or do we rely on the "more is better" argument? ("Of course, the results are better - we have an NSF grant and 15 supercomputers").
R
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org