Personally, I think we'd better come up with a far better (and
faster) incentive for not paving the planet than resource
constraints, because there's plenty enough oil and coal, and at a
damn good price (i.e., less than bottled water), to destroy
everything we have through carbon emissions. That is, if we haven't
already done so.
How do we get people to change their way of *thinking* about
"development"?
db
dba | David Breecker Associates, Inc.
Santa Fe: 505-690-2335
Abiquiu: 505-685-4891
www.BreeckerAssociates.com
On Dec 27, 2007, at 10:33 AM, Steve Smith wrote:
Is more accessible energy really going to improve the lot of the
planet or merely allow us to pave it over more quickly?
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
