The only problem with that, Nick, is that he wouldn't be in charge, any more than George W. Bush was "in charge," "the decider," etc. I think Romney's whole campaign shows this. He's a plaything of The Interests. I immediately got your reference to the possibility of a Bork-directed set of Supreme Court nominees. Doesn't give you a good feeling in the pit of your stomach.
I was not thrilled with Obama's bending over to Wall Street. But on most other issues, I'm okay with him; he'll get my vote. On Nov 4, 2012, at 10:11 PM, Nicholas Thompson wrote: > My prurient interest in seeing Romney elected is seeing what a man without > any center does when he’s in charge? My reference to the supreme court was > not and enthusiasm for a Bush v Gore kind of out come …. I think there might > be blood in the streets, if that happened again, chiefly because I might be > willing to shed some … but a fear for the four replacements of sitting > justices that may occur during the next 4 years. > > Nick
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
