Wow! Your confidence in behavioral technology is way greater than mine; but perhaps that's because I am a psychologist.
Do you find stalking laws, as presently constituted, bizarre? Nick From: Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Marcus G. Daniels Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 7:03 PM To: friam@redfish.com Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Privacy vs Open Public Data On 1/16/13 5:47 PM, Nicholas Thompson wrote: So, you see no problem there? There are good people and bad people. You can tell from the B tattooed on their wrist? So, lets us good people screw the bad people and get on with it. What if one of the bad people is a heluva musician? Or a great mathematician? N I don't believe that use of public facts is bad, and I find your stalking idea bizarre. If some subset of a community feels to harass an individual that has engaged in the past in an illegal activity, even after that individual has been treated, then those people should also get treatment. If there are public welfare risks from the past offender that are high and unaddressed, and the treatment of the offender was inadequate, then fix that. Marcus
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
