Given where the US stood in 1960, isn’t it unreasonable to expect average 
incomes in the US to go UP during a period of income equalization between 
countries?  

 

N

 

Nicholas S. Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology

Clark University

 <http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/> 
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/

 

From: Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Eric Charles
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 12:58 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] TPP pro and con

 

Meh.....

Yes, as the article points out, and as Marcus highlights, one would expect 
trade to eventually even out global wages, which is to the disadvantage of 
worker who previously had inflated wages. And the article points out that 
average wages for much of the U.S. population have been stagnant for several 
decades, which clearly is a negative affect of sorts. However, that doesn't 
necessarily invalidate the "everyone benefits" part. It is still the case that 
people with average incomes by U.S. standards own lots of things that those 
with average U.S. incomes four decades ago would find amazing. If people don't 
like the benefit of having increased access to cheap goods made overseas, they 
are perfectly capable of showing their displeasure by paying more for goods 
made here. It is pretty inconsistent to argue that you don't benefit from the 
deal while being happy to buy things that you would not have access to without 
the deals. 

 

 

 





-----------
Eric P. Charles, Ph.D.
Supervisory Survey Statistician

U.S. Marine Corps

 

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Marcus Daniels <mar...@snoutfarm.com 
<mailto:mar...@snoutfarm.com> > wrote:

"Among the big losers - those who gained little or nothing - were those at the 
bottom and the middle and working classes in the advanced countries."

Is that not only expected, but even intended?   Globalization gives people 
opportunities that don't have them and takes them away from an overly 
expensive, underskilled workforce?

-----Original Message-----
From: Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com 
<mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com> ] On Behalf Of Joe Spinden
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 10:15 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com 
<mailto:friam@redfish.com> >
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] TPP pro and con

For an informed commentary:

https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/globalization-new-discontents-by-joseph-e--stiglitz-2016-08?utm_source=project-syndicate.org
 
<https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/globalization-new-discontents-by-joseph-e--stiglitz-2016-08?utm_source=project-syndicate.org&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=authnote>
 &utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=authnote


--
Joe


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

 

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

Reply via email to