On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:26 AM, Eric Charles < eric.phillip.char...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If I was in a field that used ArXiv, and didn't secretly like the idea > of lay people and students sometimes reading my work, I wouldn't be on > either. But psychology doesn't do ArXiv, and I do secretly like those ideas. > I'm curious why you say that you "secretly" like the idea of lay people and students reading your work. Is there some taboo among psychologists against non-professionals reading professional scientific articles? > Our article on MOTH has 62 reads through Research Gate and 4 through > Academia (via my upload). > I may have missed part of the thread, but what does MOTH stand for? Or are you talking about the psychology of the night time equivalent of butterflies? A la https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/head-strong/201404/what-the-military-can-learn-the-peppered-moth
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
