Well, Peirce's work in modal logics demonstrates his methodological pluralism. So it seems to me he would agree with Dave to a large extent. Nick seems to focus on Peirce's metaphysics, of which I'm largely ignorant. But it seems like Peirce's distinction between reality and existence might help clarify any disagreements. I think his conception of reality relies on a principle of plenitude where his conception of existence does not. So I think it's a mistake to limit the conversation to truth/reality.
On October 14, 2017 11:59:08 PM PDT, Marcus Daniels <mar...@snoutfarm.com> wrote: > >You have the antenna, and he has a telescope, and you are blind and he >is deaf. Communication may be challenging and so you may each have >your own `truths'. >It would be better to combine these measurements by finding some one >that can see and hear. -- ⛧glen⛧ ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
