OK. Again, I don't think I disagree with (what I think) you're saying.  But I 
am having trouble understanding why this is related to the difference between 
an undercover LEO versus a method actor. Are you willing to connect the dots 
more explicitly?

Although I agree with the gist of what you've said just below, I disagree with 
the (apparent) implication that an actor gets their story from *the* play/movie 
script.  From what I've heard, an actor has to dig into their private, more 
grounded, stories in order to do a good job exhibiting the emotion the 
play/movie script (and the director in particular) need.  Pile that ambiguity 
underneath the ambiguity that any good play/movie will *also* rely on the 
private stories inside the audience members.  And that goes beyond merely 
ambiguous endings or director/theater cuts.  It might lie in every inflection 
and movement of the actor(s).  An actor *without* a backstory, more finely 
granulated, than that presented in the script alone, will likely give a 
flatter/2D performance.  Even if (or especially because) the audience member 
can't "feel like"/empathize with the actor, they will likely have (or not) a 
"believability" or "suspension of disbelief" that percolates through the 
performance.



On 1/28/19 12:40 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> I would again make a distinction between private stories and public stories.  
>   I may delude myself, but I also have a set of experiences that are only 
> mine and that I either could not or would not share.   My self-stories (and 
> dreams) are grounded in a way the stories I read are not.   A fiction writer 
> is trying to be entertaining, or at least sell books.   An opinion writer is 
> trying to persuade or manipulate.     The actor's story comes from a script, 
> and in that sense the it is static.   A diary is distinct from these.   There 
> aren't the degrees of freedom available in a real life that are available to 
> a writer inventing characters.    Empathy one extracts from a story is not 
> actually empathy, it is something that has been teed up for the reader.


-- 
☣ uǝlƃ
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to