Have you heard of Charity Navigator?  If not, you might want to check it out.  They evaluate charities above a certain size with published records.  They give the Shriners' Hospital for Children in Tampa, FL  a very good rating. (Comparable to Doctors Without Borders, which I like very much.)

Joe


On 4/22/20 3:17 PM, Frank Wimberly wrote:
Whenever I get drawn to contributing to a charity, usually based on sentimental TV ads, I send them an email and ask how to access their IRS Form 990, which has to be publicly available, usually via a web page.  The last time I did this was for Shriners' Hospital for Children.  If I read the form correctly, in a recent year they had $700,000,000 in income, paid $500,000,000 in executive salaries and  fundraising.  I don't believe remaining $200,000,000 all went to medical and family travel/lodging expenses.  But I may not be reading it right.  Any accountants out there?

Frank

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 2:36 PM uǝlƃ ☣ <geprope...@gmail.com <mailto:geprope...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    Heh, it's funny how something you say can be perfectly inverted by
    the audience to mean the opposite of what you intended. The
    Telephone Game is always relevant.

    My point to Steve was about "effective altruism", the idea that
    the philanthropist has any idea whatsoever of the relative
    optimality of one charity compared to another. My position is one
    of ignorance and against the (mostly wealthy, tech-savvy,
    arrogant) person's most likely *mistaken* belief in their own
    competence, especially in a domain that is fundamentally different
    from where they operate "professionally". My point to Steve was
    that meritocracy is a sham and a sibling effect to the Great Man
    Theory.

    Now, to the extent that my reading of von Hayek (not Friedman)
    argued for market forces because it is *arrogant* to pretend you
    can design a system more efficient than the one nature relaxes
    into, then I would argue for such natural, organic solutions over
    engineered ones. But that's precisely *because* those who think
    they can singularly, themselves, engineer a reality better than
    the one that grew, stigmergically, socially, naturally are most
    likely wrong.

    But I have *never* insisted there is such a thing as a *free*
    market. Everything that seems to be "natural" is constrained by
    the engineering of the agents in and around it, even if those
    agents are termites or bacteria. Whatever the Robin Hood
    foundation might mean by "free market", their very use of the term
    means I would not support them in any way. The term "free market"
    is a trigger phrase for this delicate snowflake. >8^D And I've
    already blown several cherries at billionaire phlanthropists.
    Ptouie. E.g. Bill Gates' magnanimity comes at the cost of decades
    of slimy and exploitative practices. It's reputation laundering in
    the extreme. If Bill Gates really gave a flying fsck about these
    things, he should have begun working on them *before* (or instead
    of) exploiting the world to make siphon off and concentrate
    billions of dollars.

    So, I tend to stick with established charities with proven track
    records including both the united way and the red cross. My tiny
    personal donations are doled out at the end of the year to
    organizations like mozilla, MAPS, software in the public interest,
    etc. with ZERO regard to how "efficient" or "effective" they are.
    And my real contributions are paying (and voting for) taxes and
    buying goods and services from the smallest businesses and co-ops
    I can find.

    On 4/22/20 1:04 PM, thompnicks...@gmail.com
    <mailto:thompnicks...@gmail.com> wrote:
    > I was listening to a podcast by the guy who runs Robin Hood, an
    organization dedicated to getting at the institutional roots of
    poverty.  When asked where we should give money in this crisis, he
    said, give it where you feel passion, because that is where you
    are likely to give it again.  I confess I feel passion for these
    young folks, who in the 60’s would have been  in graduate
    programs, or art or music schools, teaching, learning, inspiring,
    but are instead meagerly supporting their passions by making me
    coffee.  And very good coffee at that.  So that’s where my money
    goes. Robin Hood
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin_Hood_Foundation> might be
    better for Glen because “According to /Fortune
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortune_(magazine)>/ magazine,
    "Robin Hood was a pioneer in what is now called venture
    philanthropy, or charity that embraces free-market forces. An
    early practitioner of using metrics to measure the effectiveness
    of grants, it is a place where
    > strategies to alleviate urban poverty are hotly debated,
    ineffectual plans are coldly discarded, and its staff of 66
    hatches radical new ideas."^[
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin_Hood_Foundation#cite_note-fm-2> ”


-- ☣ uǝlƃ
    .-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .- -. -.. -..-. -..
    .- ... .... . ...
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
    Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam
    <http://bit.ly/virtualfriam>
    unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
    archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
    FRIAM-COMIC <http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/FRIAM-COMIC>
    http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/



--
Frank Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz
Santa Fe, NM 87505
505 670-9918

.-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .- -. -.. -..-. -.. .- ... .... 
. ...
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/

--
Joe

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail communication and any attachments may 
contain confidential and privileged information for the use of the designated 
recipients named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that you have received this communication in error and that any 
review, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of it or its 
contents is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, 
please notify me immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from 
your computer. Thank you.

.-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .- -. -.. -..-. -.. .- ... .... 
. ...
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 

Reply via email to