There's a layering in the relationship between fact and opinion. And what the 
postmodernists warned us about is that many of us are unable to unravel those 
layers. The idea that there exist absolute facts and (mere) interpretations of 
those facts can often be an indicator for the inability to unravel those 
layers. Sometimes, it's evidence of bad faith (e.g. when a fossil fuel 
profiteer funds or advocates for rhetoric on, say, the moral good of burning 
fossil fuels). Sometimes it's just an efficiency problem. It's more efficient, 
for the purposes of some limited scope episode, to take some assertion *as* 
fact in order to get on with assessing the suite of actions available. And 
sometimes it's simply that we're finite creatures and can't continually 
deconstruct everything to first principles all the time.

Here, in this context, Russ points to a well-unraveled attempt at a *cause* ... 
a mechanistic model. Alex Epstein and those who advocate variations on his 
story, like Pinker or Shermer, *truncate* the layering and take a particular 
*slice* of the "facts" abstracting away the rest of the inconvenient goo in 
which their skeleton is embedded. That *sampling* of the data can then be 
fleshed out by something like an interpolation, a shrink-wrap *hull* around the 
"facts" they chose. The model that obtains, the model that has been so 
*induced*, amounts to a descriptive model. No matter how well that model can 
fit the data, it's still an artificial fitting, quite distinct from a 
mechanistic model. Such fitted models have a huge host of practical fragility 
problems. Add a new triangulating fact and the whole model crumbles. Shift the 
distribution to a slightly different (in time or space) distribution of facts 
and the whole model crumbles. Etc.

So, sure, we can often agree on some assertions that we'll take as facts and 
iterate forward from there. But the ontological status of models thereby built 
will always be questionable. Only generative modeling helps us extract 
ourselves from that trap.


On 5/21/21 9:05 AM, Pieter Steenekamp wrote:
> The world is the better for all not having the same views on everything. 
> 
> Surely there's a difference between facts and opinions? Your  "*/But it is 
> *NOT* a sound, sensible, or rational view, any more than a stopped clock is 
> right twice per day./*" is your opinion, it's not a fact.
> 
> Interesting work by Jonathan Haidt on different moral values of libertarians 
> https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0042366 
> <https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0042366> . 
>  It's good to be mindful in having a discussion with someone with different 
> moral values, you see the world with different biases.
> 
> *Take for example global warming.
> We might agree on the following facts:*
> The earth has been getting warmer and the sea levels have been rising since 
> the end of the mini ice age circa 1850
> CO2 contributes to the earth getting warmer
> Humans are causing CO2 to increase
> 
> *What we might disagree on is in the interpretation of the facts, for 
> example:*
> The use of RCP 8.5 as reason for alarm
> The accuracy of the models, for example the significant differences between 
> balloon measurements and model predictions
> The empirical evidence that the climate sensitivity is low enough that we 
> probably don't have reason for alarm about global warming
> All the benefits of fossil fuels for humanity
> The climategate evidence of deliberate dishonesty of prominent climate 
> scientists like Mickael Mann
> 
> The facts are not relative, it's absolute, so I don't subscribe to the  
> postmodernists' "relativism" for factual matters.
> 
> Our opinions are guided by our moral values. This is where it;s good to allow 
> others their place under the sun too. 

-- 
↙↙↙ uǝlƃ

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

Reply via email to