Oh, sorry. I meant that I already concatenated them with pdftk and if anyone else wanted
a copy, then I could send it to them. I simply used wget -r -A "*.pdf" to get
them all from that url, then cat'ed them with pdftk. When books are assembled
contributions like the one Nick and EricC contributed to
(https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-61773-8) then individual PDFs for the
chapters makes some sense. IDK. Maybe I'm just old.
On 7/25/22 14:38, Roger Critchlow wrote:
Glen --
Glad to facilitate. There is no whole document pdf link that I could find. I
figure they just supplied the output files from TeX. The next step for the
publisher doesn't require a concatenated pdf. I used gs to concatenate.
INPUT="f000[2-7]00_*.pdf c*_*.pdf r*_*.pdf c005600_*.pdf"
gs -dBATCH -dNOPAUSE -q -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -dPDFSETTINGS=/prepress
-sOutputFile=art-of-abduction.pdf ${INPUT}
Do you know how to concatenate the book parts and get functioning hyperlinks?
-- rec --
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 10:40 AM glen <geprope...@gmail.com
<mailto:geprope...@gmail.com>> wrote:
This is excellent! Thanks for the pointer. Maybe I missed the whole
document link. But I've assembled the PDFs into 1 file if anyone would like me
to send it to them.
On 7/24/22 06:12, Roger Critchlow wrote:
> Here's a new free book at MIT Press which I'm finding readable.
Suggested by hackernews.
>
> https://direct.mit.edu/books/oa-monograph/5329/The-Art-of-Abduction
<https://direct.mit.edu/books/oa-monograph/5329/The-Art-of-Abduction>
<https://direct.mit.edu/books/oa-monograph/5329/The-Art-of-Abduction
<https://direct.mit.edu/books/oa-monograph/5329/The-Art-of-Abduction>>
>
> From the Introduction:
> If you are a linguist, I encourage you to read on because abduction has been said to
be fundamental to determining what a speaker means by an utterance. Specifically, it has been
argued that decoding utterances is a matter of figuring out the best explanation of why someone said
what she said when she said it. Even more specifically, authors working in the field of pragmatics
have suggested that hearers invoke the Gricean maxims of conversation (Grice, 1989)
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative_principle
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative_principle>
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative_principle
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative_principle>>] to help them work out the best
explanation of a speaker's utterance whenever the semantic content of the utterance is
insufficiently informative for the purposes of the conversation, or is /too/ informative, or is off
topic, or is implausible, or is otherwise odd or inappropriate. As Yan Huang
(1994, p. 2) puts it, "What pragmatics does is to provide a set of ...
/explanatory/ principles which constrains
> the interpretation or production of an utterance whose linguistic
representation has already been antecedently cognized" (emphasis mine).
--
ꙮ Mɥǝu ǝlǝdɥɐuʇs ɟᴉƃɥʇ' ʇɥǝ ƃɹɐss snɟɟǝɹs˙ ꙮ
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
