teleonomic matter (particles that think) - totally consistent with Vedic / 
Buddhist cosmology. Even elementary particles are subject to the Law of Karma 
if they "misbehave"—something very unlikely, but not impossible.

davew


On Mon, Jul 17, 2023, at 10:27 PM, Roger Critchlow wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 2:35 PM David Eric Smith <desm...@santafe.edu> wrote:
>> [...] [Yoshi Oono's The Nonlinear World]
>> in which he argues that the phenomena you mention are only “pseudo-complex”. 
>>  Yoshi, like David but with less of the predictable “Darwin-was-better; now 
>> what subject are we discussing today?” vibe, argues that there is a 
>> threshold to “true complexity” that is only crossed in systems that obey 
>> what Yoshi calls a “Pasteur principle”; they are of a kind that effectively 
>> can’t emerge spontaneously, but can evolve from ancestors once they exist.  
>> He says (translating slightly from his words to mine) that such systems 
>> split the notion of “boundary conditions” into two sub-kinds that differ 
>> qualitatively.  There are the “fundamental conditions” (in biology, the 
>> contents of genomes with indefinitely deep ancestry), that mine an 
>> indefinite past sparsely and selectively, versus ordinary “boundary 
>> conditions”, which are the dense here-and-now.  The fundamental conditions 
>> often provide criteria that allow the complex thing to respond to parts of 
>> the here-and-now, and ignore other parts, feeding back onto the update of 
>> the fundamental conditions.  
>> 
>> I don’t know when I will get time to listen to David’s appearance with Sean, 
>> so with apologies cannot know whether his argument is similar in its logic.  
>> But Yoshi’s framing appeals to me a lot, because it is like a kind of 
>> spontaneous symmetry breaking or ergodicity breaking in the representations 
>> of information and how they modulate the networks of connection to the 
>> space-time continuum.  That seems to me a very fertile idea.  I am still 
>> looking for some concrete model that makes it compelling and useful for 
>> something I want to solve.  (I probably have written this on the list 
>> before, in which case apologies for being repetitive.  But this mention is 
>> framed specifically to your question whether one should be disappointed in 
>> the demotion of the complexity in phenomena.)
>> [...]
>>> On Jul 18, 2023, at 4:37 AM, Stephen Guerin <stephengue...@fas.harvard.edu> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> [...]
>>>  1. Teleonomic Material: the latest use by David Krakauer on Sean Carroll's 
>>> recent podcast 
>>> <https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2023/07/10/242-david-krakauer-on-complexity-agency-and-information/>
>>>  in summarizing Complexity. Hurricanes, flocks and Benard Cells according 
>>> to David are not Complex, BTW. I find the move a little frustrating and 
>>> disappointing but I always respect his perspective.
> Okay, I listened to the podcast.
> 
> DK says that real complexity starts with teleonomic matter, also known as 
> particles that think.  He says that such agents carry around some 
> representation of the external world.  And then the discussion gets 
> distracted to other topics, at one point getting to "large language model 
> paper clip nightmares".
> 
> My response to Eric's description of Oono's  "Pasteur principle" was that it 
> sounds a lot like "Attention Is All You Need" 
> (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1706.03762.pdf), the founding paper of the Transformer 
> class of neural network models.  
> 
> The "fundamental conditions" in a Transformer would be the trained neural net 
> which specifies the patterns of attention and responses learned during 
> training.  The "ordinary conditions" would be the input sequence given to the 
> Transformer.  The Transformer breaks up the input sequence into attention 
> patterns, evaluates the response to the current set of input values selected 
> by the attention patterns,  emits an element to the output sequence, and 
> advances the input cursor.
> 
> Anyone else see the family resemblance here?
> 
> -- rec --
> 
> -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
> https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
> to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives:  5/2017 thru present 
> https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>   1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
> 
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to