I guess I need to know what "cause" means to you.  To me it means that
ceteris paribus, if you havent flapped your lips in that manner I would not
have passed you the salt.

n

On Wed, Feb 4, 2026 at 4:01 PM glen <[email protected]> wrote:

> Not that communication is impossible; that it doesn't exist. Granted, I've
> advocated Lewisian possible worlds. So it's understandable you'd impute
> {¬X⊢¬◇X}. But I don't think I agree with Lewis. Just 'cause something's
> possible doesn't mean it obtains, here or elsewhere. And something that's
> possible *could* exist. (Is that tautological? I don't think so. Usually,
> when we say "It's possible", we're implicitly asserting that it *isn't* but
> could have been. Monkeys may fly out my butt, as the kids used to say.)
>
> Communication may be possible, for some definition of it. For the
> definitions I've seen, it doesn't exist.
>
> My best definition of it, that I might buy exists, is post-hoc
> rationalization of some overly simplified, just-so story about the causes
> of some present state. You flapped your lips. I gave you a salt shaker. If
> you think your lip flapping *caused* me to give you the salt shaker, there
> aren't many ways I could flap my lips to dissuade you of that story.
>
> If that post-hoc rationalization is what we mean by "communication", then
> yes, it may well exist. Anything's possible.
>
> On 2/4/26 1:07 PM, Nicholas Thompson wrote:
> > Dogs notwithstanding, if Glen says that communication is impossible,
> he's just wrong.  I am sure he is saying SOMETHING TRUE, because Glen
> usually does.  I can imagine specifications and qualifications of that
> statement that are true.   "Its impossible to communicate with somebody who
> isnt listening"  Thats true enough.  Its possible that we in FRIAM have
> just run out of reasons to LISTEN.   That may be what Jon's post and his
> reference to Ezra Klein was about.  We definitely have a shortage of
> listeners in todays marketplace of ideas.  Funny the market has not
> responded to that need.  I am now paying at least one person to read my
> substack.    Nick
> >
> --
> ¡sıɹƎ ןıɐH ⊥ ɐןןǝdoɹ ǝ uǝןƃ
> ὅτε oi μὲν ἄλλοι κύνες τοὺς ἐχϑροὺς δάκνουσιν, ἐγὰ δὲ τοὺς φίλους, ἵνα
> σώσω.
>
>
> .- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. /
> ... --- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
> https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
> to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives:  5/2017 thru present
> https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>   1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>


-- 
Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology
Clark University
[email protected]
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson
https://substack.com/@monist
.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... 
--- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to